Thursday, November 3, 2011

The Occupy Protestors could learn a few lessons from my kids.


by R. Murdock

As I was watching the news and seeing the video footage of the unrest going on around the country and specifically in Oakland, something seemed vaguely familiar about the protestor’s behavior.  Then it hit me.  They reminded me of my kids!  At first I sympathized with their movement and even empathized with them.  But as the protests have dragged on without any specific goals, and as they’ve become violent and destructive, I have no more sympathy for them.  They are a bunch of adults throwing a group tantrum.  If they lived in my home, these are the lessons I would teach the so called 99%.

Lesson 1: My two-year old has recently entered the notorious tantrum stage, or terrible twos.  She is perfectly happy as long as she can eat candy all day long and watch Dora.  But if I take away the candy or turn off the TV, she throws a huge tantrum and is nearly inconsolable.  But I don’t get too upset.  After all, she’s only two, and after awhile she’ll learn that We don’t throw tantrums when we don’t get our way.

Lesson 2: I also have a six and eight year-old who get extremely upset anytime one gets to do something that the other doesn’t.  Whenever they eat, they assess their portion sizes or count every sliced piece of fruit to make sure that they have an equal amount.  If they discover that the other person has more than them, a big whine fest ensues about how life isn’t fair.  How do I respond?  With the same answer my mom gave me when I was a kid:
“Who said life is fair?”.

I hated that answer when I got it, and my kids don’t like it either.  But I’ve tried to teach them that throughout their entire life, they will constantly see people who have more of something than they do.  It may not seem fair.  But life isn’t meant to be that way. The sooner they accept that, the less disappointing their life will be.

Lesson 3: My eight year-old son loves to earn money.  He’s constantly looking for jobs around the house to earn a quarter here and there.  We’ve tried to teach our kids the value of hard work and entrepreneurship, and he’s the child that seems to fully embrace those concepts.  By working hard and saving, as well as coming up with various “business ideas” to sell things to kids in the neighborhood, he normally has a fair amount of change on hand to buy the things he wants.
 
This doesn’t make his little sister very happy.  In fact, she thinks it’s just not fair that he has money to spend when she doesn’t.  She wants me to just give her money. But whenever I ask her to do a chore, she refuses.  She doesn’t normally look for opportunities to make money like he does.  She would rather play dress-ups and Barbies than spend the day folding laundry, scrubbing the bathroom or washing the dishes.  And who can blame her?  She is only six after all!  Since she normally doesn’t have any change on hand to spend I explain to her that If you aren't willing to do the work (any work), you are not going to get paid. 

I’m assuming that these Occupy protestors were taught similar lessons in their own homes.  By now, they are all old enough to have learned that we don’t throw tantrums when we don’t get our way. Life isn’t fair.  If we want money, we need to be willing to work for it.  And another important lesson: we shouldn’t covet what someone else has.

I know that 14 million people are out of work in this country.  In fact, my husband lost his job when the economy came crashing down, too.  We almost went bankrupt and lost our house.  But we avoided our own financial meltdown by renting our house out, moving into my parent’s basement, starting a business and working every random job we could find.  We could be out there with those protestors with signs that read, “Death to Capitalism” and “We’re part of the 99%” But we don’t give our power away that easily. 

My husband has a degree, a lot of experience and has worked in management.  But when he could only find a job that paid $10 an hour, he took it.  It was not enough for us to even barely scrape by.  So we started a business. In the last three years since losing his job, we’ve managed to keep our house, avoid bankruptcy, pay off over $30k in debt and provide employment to other people.  Those things would never have happened for us had we pointed the finger of blame at others rather than work towards a solution. 

Are we mad at capitalism for putting us in that position? NO!  Capitalism saved us.  It provided the opportunity for us to recover.   We don’t have time to protest and whine about life not being fair. We are too busy working, providing jobs, paying off our debts and trying not to be a burden on society.

To these protestors I’d say: instead participating in a massive group tantrum by causing civil unrest, rioting, putting police officers’ lives in danger, destroying property and setting fires-they should be taking control of their lives. They should be using capitalism to their own advantage; to improve their own situation, whatever it may be.  Government can’t create jobs.  Yet, if these 14 million unemployed people tried to start their own businesses, surely a good percentage of them could succeed. It is totally possible. 

We are not wealthy. We are not part of the so-called 1% and we still live in my parent’s basement.  But I don’t covet what the rich have.  I didn’t earn their riches. They did.  I didn’t sacrifice, take risks and put in the hard work to get where they are.  But you know what? I’m willing to do what it takes to get myself in a better place.  And after all that we have sacrificed to pay off debt, build our business and create wealth, I would sure as heck not want any of the 99% saying they want an “equal share” of my hard earned money.  If they want it, they need to go out there and be builders, not wreckers.


6 comments:

  1. For more accuracy, they should have a third group other that the 1% and 99% groups. I am definitely not in the 1% group, but I certainly do not consider myself to be in the 99% group. In fact, I bet there are a whole lot of other people that they consider as part of the 99% group who do not want to be part of the idiotic 99% group. Those people are the nanny staters. Hence, there should be the 1% crowd, the middle-class crowd who do not claim to be in the 99%, and the true nanny stater crowd who comprise about 47% of the population. Therefore, the middle-class crowd who do not claim to be in the 99% group would probably comprise 52% of the population at most. This is the group that funds the 47% nanny staters.

    ReplyDelete
  2. True. I consider myself part of the 53%. As in the 53% of the population who actually pays taxes.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Great article! In a sense capitalism as it stands now is not a pure capitalism. It is mixed with socialistic ideas and programs that are screwing with the U.S. in becoming a pure capitalistic nation. In my mind I believe that the 99%er's want more socialistic programs. They want what others have worked for because, like you said, "it's not fair!" Capitalistic nations (which their aren't any pure capitalistic countries)have limited government control in business and provide services like roads, police, firemen, and so forth. Businesses are left to maintian and use resources for the good of the nation. Consumers play a roll in that they spend money on companies. It's how the economy should work. In my view the government has gotten too large and too much power. Now the big businesses are taking advantage of that because they can lobby for subsidies or new reforms to help gain market power and make more money. Or in the banks case, "too large to fail." In a pure capitalistic nation no entity would be too large to fail. Businesses under capitalism have private losses and private profits. With the 99% wanting part of that profit then they should also be willing to share in the losses as well. How would that go?! "Sorry John, last quarter we made great profits but this quarter we had a loss...we are going to need 10k from you by the end of the month. Oh and by the way...it's only fair." Well that's my lil rant or view on things. Great article and it got me thinking! Keep up the great work!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Great life lessons that we all should apply to ourselves. I really enjoyed and agreed with your article Rachel. I have always believed that we should be part of the solution and not part of the problem. It takes hard work and team effort to find solutions not sitting around in a park for two two months causing health issues and infringing on the rights of others. Well written!

    ReplyDelete
  5. This is spot on Rae! I was laughing out loud over the comparison to a 2 year old who wants to eat candy and watch Dora all day. So funny but SO true! These occupiers are ridiculous! The last paragraph is simple and yet contains profound common sense. As I read it I just kept nodding my head saying, "amen sister!" Pure awesomeness!

    ReplyDelete
  6. To eminitrader: A few benefits are important to consider in a socialist style of capitalism.

    First of all is that without any kind of regulation, we wouldn't have minimum wage, laws on overtime, child labor, and more. Businesses rarely opt to spend more money to do the right thing, so there needs to be some kind of regulation to ensure that the common person isn't taken advantage of by the corporation. Part of our problem today is because big business has been allowed to do whatever they want without repercussions. Unfortunately, our government has sided with big business and is not protecting the rights of the common person. That isn't socialism in our government, that's corruption.

    Second is the need to take care of those who are truly in need. When my husband lost his job and we found out I was pregnant, we were very grateful for Medicaid for helping us through that tough time. We had never received government help before that time and we hope to never have to do it again. We are glad to pay taxes that support those kind of programs, because we understand, now more than ever, that people aren't always to blame for their misfortune. A civilized society should have provisions to care for their poor.

    ReplyDelete

Comments are moderated. Differing opinions are welcome, but rude and insulting comments will not be published.